Scientific report writing
Scientific report writing requires the use of certain techniques
and conventions that are detailed, strict and not always easy to
master. The main aim of a report is to provide precise information
about a practical investigation, for example, an experiment or series
of experiments, so that the reader can understand it and duplicate
it if necessary. Certain conventions of writing (for example, section
headings) have been more or less universally adopted, and most major
scientific publications adhere to these rules.
It is difficult to generalise about the format of scientific
assignments as distinct from other kinds of scholarly assignments,
not only because format varies from field to field, but also within
the same field. The preferred format for a scientific report may
be prescribed by:
- the relevant Australian learned society (for example, the Australian
Institute of Physics);
- the leading Australian primary serial in that field (for example,
the Australian Journal of Chemistry). Such societies and
serials usually publish 'Instructions To Authors' that are generally
found in the first or last pages of the serial or proceedings
of the learned society;
- the format provided to you by the lecturer (or coordinator)
of the relevant unit or subject.
If in doubt, you should always consult the unit or subject coordinator
prior
to writing a designated scientific report.
Style
It is customary for reports to be written in the third person or
the 'scientific passive', for example, instead of writing 'I saw',
one writes 'it was observed'; rather than, 'I think that ...' one
writes 'it could be stated that ...' and so on.
Format
The format detailed here reflects some of the more common conventions
used in various scientific disciplines.
In the guide that follows, sections and headings, are set out as
they are usually set out in a report.
Title of the report
It is usual to write the title as one phrase or sentence without
inverted commas or underlining and with only the first letter a
capital. Other words in the title do not begin with capital letters.
The title should appear in the centre of the page. A good title
is brief and informative. Titles should not exceed 10 or 12 words,
and they should reveal the content of the study. Many titles take
one of these two forms:
-
Y as a function of X (for example, The incidence of sunburn
in different latitudes)
- The effect of X upon Y (for example, The effect of phosphate
on cabbage yield)
In both cases Y refers to the dependent variable (for example,
the behaviour) being studied and X refers to the independent variable(s)
being manipulated (that is, the variable being measured).
Abstract
This section is a brief summary of the entire report, and should
cover something from each section of the report: the reason for
undertaking the research, the chief aspects of method, the major
results and conclusions should all be included. The abstract follows
immediately after the title of the report and has a maximum length
of 200 words. Researchers generally scan the titles and abstracts
of papers prior to requesting a copy of the full article from the
author so the summary should make sense if it is extracted from
the report. (Albert Einstein holds the record for the shortest scientific
abstract: e = mc2.)
Introduction
This section should contain a brief history of the research problem
with appropriate references to the relevant literature and the purpose
of the study. The introduction should also explain whether the study
is an extension of a previous one, or whether a completely new hypothesis
is to be tested. The introduction is usually structured to flow
from a statement of the broad problem or question being examined
to the specific aims of the particular study being reported. The
final section of the introduction generally includes a list of all
the hypotheses being tested in the study. The results of the current
study are not to be referred to in the introduction.
Materials and methods
This section should be precise and detailed enough to allow the
reader to perform the same experiment or series of experiments.
The subsections of Materials And Methods should include:
- Materials (or Chemicals)
All specific materials and/or chemicals used and their source(s)
should be stated. General statements such as 'All other chemicals
were of analytical grade' are acceptable.
- Subjects (behavioural, social and medical sciences) or
Animals (zoology and experimental medical experiments)
or Species (zoology and botany).
State the source, number and sex of human subjects, species of
non-human subjects and plants. If the subjects are grouped, the
criteria for the grouping should be specified (for example, by
age, sex, height, weight, and treatment). Any control group should
be described in detail.
- Procedure (or Experimental method)
Include all important aspects such as the number of trials per
experimental session and instructions given to human subjects
or the treatments of non-human subjects and plants. For chemical
or physical studies, include document reaction volumes, temperatures,
voltage, etc. Describe the apparatus used. Include illustrations
where necessary. The latter should carry a title (or legend)
and a figure number (see Results section).
Copies of questionnaires and tests should be included in the Appendices.
- Data analysis
Raw experimental data is often transformed into more meaningful
and simple forms using mathematical equations (usually with the
aid of a computer). The basic mathematical theory behind such
transformations or the computer program used should be documented
and suitably referenced. Statistical tests are used to determine
whether mean values are significantly different from each other.
When using inferential statistics to analyse the data, a clear
statement should be given of the inferential test chosen and justification
for its use. A statement reflecting the meaning of derived probability
values should be presented. For example, the most common and simple
statistical test for comparing two means (or averages) is the
t-test. A P value of less than 0.05 is classed as statistically
significant. This latter statement is generally abbreviated to
'P < 0.05 was classed as statistically significant'.
Results
Data derived from an experiment or series of experiments is the
basis of a scientific report or paper. The data may be presented
in the form of graphs or tables which may include results of statistical
tests if applied to evaluate the data. Raw data,that is, individual
values, should be placed in the Appendix and only referred to in
results.
Tables are an easy and neat way of summarising the results. Tables
should stand alone, that is, the reader should be able to understand
the contents of the table without referring to the Materials And
Methods section. Generally, tables have the following features:
- a descriptive title (or legend) identifying the results being
presented and how they were derived (that is, in what sort of
study). The legends attached to tables and figures should be detailed
enough for the table or figure to be intelligible if detached
from the report.
- column headings which are exact and (where appropriate) scientific
units of measurement included under the column headings.
- abbreviations used within the table should be defined in footnotes
immediately under the table.
- where the results of statistical tests are included, the type
of test used should be included as a footnote to the table. Generally,
an asterix (*) or a similar symbol is placed next to a value which
is statistically significant different from the control value
for a particular measurement. The level of significance is stated
as a footnote to the table (for example *, P < 0.01). Both
the type of statistical test and the level of significance may
form a single footnote (for example,*, P < 0.01, t-test).
- the type and number of subjects (if applicable) used must be
specified. By convention, a column referring to the number of
experiments or subjects is headed "n".
- tables should be numbered (Table 1, Table 2) in order of appearance
within the text.
An alternative or additional way of presenting data is in the form
of line graphs, bar-charts, pie-charts, etc. Graphs, charts and
illustrations are referred to as 'figures' (for example, Fig. 1)
in the text of the report. All figures should be numbered in order
of appearance in the text. As a general rule, data presented in
tabular form should not be duplicated as a figure but if tabulated
data is derived from graphs, then such graphs may then be included.
For example, Table 1 may summarise maximum and minimum values whereas
Figure 1 may show the graph from which the values were obtained.
Whether they are hand-drawn or computer-generated, graphs, bar-charts
or pie-charts should have the following features:
- a full title (similar to those used on tables);
- clearly labelled axes and scientific units of measurements.
For example, the x and y axes for a graph of height versus age
would be: Age (yrs) and Height (cm).
- avoid the use of colour in figures. Although some newer scientific
journals use colour, most still use black and white printing.
Thus, all symbols and lines on graphs should be in black and white
(., Δ, û).
- statistics and abbreviations should be presented as for tables.
Discussion
This is the most difficult section of a report to write and requires
considerable thought and care. Essentially it is a consideration
of the results obtained in the study, guided by any statistical
tests used, indicating whether the hypotheses tested are considered
true or are to be rejected.
This is best thought of in three steps: the main results must be
very briefly summarised; the procedure must be critically assessed
and weaknesses noted; and a final evaluation of the results made
in terms of the design, leading to a final judgment concerning the
hypotheses being tested. The discussion can only refer to results
which are presented in the results section. Any detailed results
which only appear in the appendixes cannot be discussed.
Evaluation of the results should include reference to other research
with indications as to whether or not the current findings are in
agreement with other findings (that is, reference is made to the
introduction). The main conclusions reached should be summarised
at the end of the discussion. Suggestions for follow-up research
can also be given.
References
When writing scientific papers, the way in which references are
cited in the texts and are listed at the end of a paper must be
in accordance with the rules of the relevant learned society or
with the practice of the leading serial. Consult your lecturers
for their requirements.
All references used in the report, but no others, should be listed
here. A strict alphabetical listing by author is followed, according
to the Harvard
(author-date) system.
OR
Number the references using the Vancouver
system,
for example,
Jenson (3) reported the reaction ..., or
Jenson 3 reported the reaction ...
Einstein et al. (5) showed that.....
If the reference is not associated directly with an author or group
of authors, then place the reference number at the end of the sentence,
for example,
The weather on Mars is rather cold (7).
Full references are listed in numerical order at the end of the
assignment.
Back to Content
|