Hobart
This unit has been discontinued.
Introduction
Summary %globals_context%
| Unit name | Sport Doping, Performance Enhancing Drugs and their Detection |
|---|---|
| Unit code | XBR122 |
| Credit points | 12.5 |
| Faculty/School | College of Health and Medicine School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology |
| Discipline | Pharmacy|Chemistry|Law |
| Coordinator | %asset_metadata_unit.Coordinator% |
| Teaching staff | %asset_metadata_unit.Staff% |
| Available as student elective? | %asset_metadata_unit.AvailableAsElective_value^empty:No% |
| Breadth Unit? | %asset_metadata_unit.IsBreadthUnit_value% |
Availability
Note
Please check that your computer meets the minimum System Requirements if you are attending via Distance/Off-Campus.
Units are offered in attending mode unless otherwise indicated (that is attendance is required at the campus identified). A unit identified as offered by distance, that is there is no requirement for attendance, is identified with a nominal enrolment campus. A unit offered to both attending students and by distance from the same campus is identified as having both modes of study.
Special approval is required for enrolment into TNE Program units.
TNE Program units special approval requirements.
* The Final WW Date is the final date from which you can withdraw from the unit without academic penalty, however you will still incur a financial liability (see withdrawal dates explained for more information).
Fees
Teaching
| Teaching Pattern | Fully online. |
|---|---|
| Assessment | Engagement Activity 1&2 (unit outline & plagiarism quiz). 0% weight; Assessment Task 1 Mock poster presentation to a sporting group about a particular performance enhancing drug, 25% weight; Assessment Task 2 Written review of the prohibited status of a drug, its performance effects and health risks. Consists of assignment questions regarding pharmacology and use in a fictitious doping scenario, 50% weight; Assessment Task 3 Review of doping detection quality assurance, ethical boundaries and legal framework. A group assessment through online discussion where participants review a fictitious case/scenario of doping each from a different perspective - a doping regulator, legal defence, analytical chemist, and the media/layperson and submit a group response, 25% weight. |
| Timetable | View the lecture timetable | View the full unit timetable |
Textbooks
| Required | None |
|---|
The University reserves the right to amend or remove courses and unit availabilities, as appropriate.