This is a slightly modified version of Henry Reynolds, ‘Andrew Inglis Clark (1848-1907)’, Australian Dictionary of Biography, vol. 3 , pp. 399-401.

CLARK, ANDREW INGLIS (1848-1907). barrister, politician and judge, was born on 24 February 1848 in Hobart Town. He was the youngest son of Alexander Russell Clark, a successful engineer, building contractor and ironfounder, and his wife Ann, née Inglis. Clark was a delicate child. He was taught by his mother until eligible to enrol in the Hobart High School. He was later apprenticed in the family firm, becoming a qualified engineer and its business manager. At 24 he turned to the law, was articled to R.P. Adams, and in 1877 was called to the Bar. In 1878 he married Grace Paterson, daughter of John Ross, a Hobart shipbuilder.

In the 1870s Clark became an active member of local debating and literary societies. With a few Unitarians, he was prominent in the Minerva Club, where contemporary problems were discussed. In 1874 he edited the club’s journal Quadrilateral, which each month published articles on politics, literature and philosophy. Clark joined the American Club along with other ‘young, ardent republicans’; at its annual dinner in 1876 he declared that ‘We have met here tonight in the name of the principles which were proclaimed by the founders of the Anglo-American Republic … and we do so because we believe those principles to be permanently applicable to the politics of the world’.

In 1878 Clark contested the House of Assembly elections as the protégé of Thomas Reibey, who was reputed to have the electorate of Norfolk Plains in his pocket. Clark was attacked by The Mercury for ‘holding such very extreme ultra-republican, if not revolutionary, ideas’ that his proper place was among ‘Communists’. The Launceston Examiner called him ‘a mere fledgling’ and a ‘stranger’ from Hobart. After a lively debate Clark was elected unopposed in July. He told his electors that he would join the Opposition, denied that he was a revolutionist but wanted government that would not benefit any particular class. He also attacked the government’s tariff policy and new electoral bill, and advocated the ending of controversy between the administration and the Main Line Railway Co., preferably by government purchase. In the Assembly he was one of the few private members to introduce legislation, and, although unable to amend the Master and Servant Act, he carried the Criminal Law Amendment Act in 1880. He also helped the Premier, W.R. Giblin, to reframe the customs tariff. Clark was defeated in the 1882 election and similarly failed to win East Hobart in 1884 and 1886.

Clark won a reputation as fine criminal lawyer in a ‘poisoning case’ and soon built up a large practice in civil jurisdiction as well, although his generosity and refusal ‘to accept anything beyond a reasonable and modest fee’ prevented him from becoming wealthy from his legal practice. While out of parliament he not only developed his practice, but continued to lead the liberal attack on conservatism and the remnants of the convict tradition. In 1885 he helped found the Southern Tasmanian Political Reform Association. Its aims included manhood suffrage, larger electorates, triennial parliaments, municipal reform and the prohibition of paid canvassers and cabs in elections; it helped to enrol electors and organized a campaign for the 1886 elections. Clark formulated proposals for the redistribution of seats; he was also one of the first politicians to be actively supported by the Hobart Trades and Labor Council.

In January 1887 he went into partnership with Matthew Wilkes Simmons and in March won the seat of South Hobart in the Assembly. He was appointed Attorney-General by Premier P.O. Fysh. With Fysh in the Upper House, Clark became largely responsible for introducing legislation in the House of Assembly. During his term as Attorney-General he initiated, according to one estimate, 228 ministerial bills. Even in his first term Clark enhanced his reputation as an outstanding Liberal by introducing much progressive and humanitarian legislation, including the Master and Servant Amendment Act 1887, which he had advocated in his first electoral address. Other important legislation included the legalizing of trade unions, restricting the entry of Chinese, preventing cruelty to animals, reimbursing members of parliament and reforming laws on lunacy and the custody of children. He was less successful in trying to impose a land tax, introduce manhood suffrage and centralize the police. As Attorney-General he became involved in the dispute between the government and the Main Line Railway Co., but despite his efforts the company was awarded arrears of interest by the Supreme Court. Clark advised the government to appeal to the Privy Council and he went to England in 1890 to conduct the case. Empowered to treat with the directors, he successfully negotiated out of court the purchase of their property.

Clark then visited America. His radicalism always had strong Unitarian links and in 1883 he had entertained Moncure Conway, an American Unitarian preacher and author, in Hobart. Conway introduced him to Oliver Wendell Holmes and other well-known Unitarians, many of them academics and lawyers, with whom Clark corresponded for the rest of life. Always impressed by the American Constitution and its democratic and republican ideals, he returned to Hobart convinced of their suitability for Australia.

Through his experience as business manager of the family engineering firm Clark first became interested in Federation as a solution to intercolonial tariff rivalry. He was a delegate to the Federal Council in 1888, 1889, 1891, and 1894 and the Australasian Federation Conference in Melbourne in 1890. Before the National Australasian Convention in Sydney in 1891 he circulated his own draft constitution bill. This was practically a transcript of relevant provisions from the British North American Act, the United States Constitution and the Federal Council Act, arranged systematically, but it was to be of great use to the drafting committee at the convention. Henry Parkes, representing New South Wales, received it with reservations, suggesting that the style was too literary and that ‘the structure should be evolved bit by bit’. One of Clark’s political heroes, George Higinbotham from Victoria, admitted the ‘acknowledged defects & disadvantages’ of responsible government, but criticized Clark’s plan to separate the executive and the legislature. Clark’s draft also differed from the adopted constitution in his proposal for ‘a separate federal judiciary’, with the new Supreme Court replacing the Privy Council as the highest court of appeal on all questions of law, which would be ‘a wholesome innovation upon the American system’. He became a member of the Constitutional Committee and chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Although he took little part in the debates, he assisted Samuel Griffith of Queensland, Edmund Barton New South Wales, and Charles Kingston of South Australia in revising Griffith’s original draft of the adopted constitution on the Queensland government’s steam yacht, Lucinda; though he was too ill to be present when the main work was done, his own draft had been the basis for most of Griffith’s text. In his book The Federal Story (Melbourne, 1963), Alfred Deakin described Clark at the conference as ‘Small, spare, nervous, active, jealous and suspicious in disposition, and somewhat awkward in manner and ungraceful in speech, he was nevertheless a sound lawyer, keen, logical and acute’.

After the Fysh government fell in 1892 to the conservative government headed by Henry Dobson, Clark joined the Opposition. But in 1894 he resumed the position of Attorney-General under Edward Braddon’s government and continued to introduce much legislation. In 1896, at his fourth attempt, he succeeded in amending the Electoral Act by extending the franchise and introducing in Hobart and Launceston proportional representation under what became known as the Hare-Clark system as a memorial to his name. Although first introduced for only a year it was renewed annually until suspended in 1902, and in 1907 was adopted for the whole State.

On 27 October 1897 Clark resigned from the Braddon government after colleagues ignored his plea for a concession to the Emu Bay Railway Company to extend their line to Mount Lyell. His resignation was the prelude to political confusion. Efforts were made to secure a reconciliation between Clark and Braddon, while John Henry did his utmost to bring down the government and planned a new ministry under Clark. However, Braddon survived the crisis and Clark again joined the Opposition, becoming leader for a short time in late 1897 and early 1898. He received many complimentary letters on his stand against the Braddon Ministry, including one from the Hobart Chess Club congratulating their president on ‘preferring resignation to perpetual check’.

In the 1890s Clark encouraged the young leaders of the Tasmanian Federation Leagues, who became known as ‘Clark’s Boys’ and who dubbed him as their ‘Padre’. He did not attend the 1897 Federal Convention because he was visiting America to improve his health and to leave some sons there to complete their education. On his return he introduced the draft constitution in the House of Assembly, although he remained doubtful about the financial provisions. In his The Federal Financial Problem and its Solution (Hobart, 1900), he argued that the difficulty could be solved by ‘the transfer of the largest possible proportionate part of the public debt of each colony to the Federal Government’. He was also concerned about the judiciary clauses and sent written amendments to the 1898 convention. They were tabled by Barton who wrote to him: ‘The paper is regarded as a very valuable one, & by it you have added to your many services to the cause of Federation’. Clark continued to correspond with his American friends on questions of Federation and sent them copies of the convention debates.

On 1 June 1898 Clark was appointed a puisne judge of the Supreme Court of Tasmania and senior judge on 1 May 1901. Chief Justice Samuel Way of South Australia congratulated him: ‘You take with you the learning, the judgment, and all the moral qualities needed to maintain the prestige and usefulness of your high office’. Clark was knowledgeable in all branches of the law, but made his name as a constitutional lawyer and jurist. His Studies in Australian Constitutional Law was published in Melbourne in 1901. In 1903 he was tentatively offered a seat on the High Court but parliament cut the number of judges from 5 to 3; he was again passed over when the bench was enlarged in 1906. Professor Harrison Moore consoled him: ‘Well, for many reasons I am sorry. But I fear you would have taken it too hard, and that the constant journeying, the want of any permanent settlement, and the break-up of your family life would have left you little of joy in the office’. Clark strongly disapproved of the Judiciary Act Amendment Bill in 1907, protesting that nothing in the Constitution gave the Commonwealth parliament power to deprive State courts of administering any part of their State laws.

Few of Clark’s writings were published. In 1891 he had joined the American Academy of Political and Social Science and in 1900 published a paper on ‘Natural Rights’ in their Annals. His unpublished works, written in exercise books for circulation among friends, are extensive and fall into three broad categories: philosophical essays, studies on different aspects of the Australian and American Constitutions and serious legal discourses; there are also two slim volumes of poetry. He was widely read in literature and the law, and, consistent with his reputation as ‘an inquirer in almost every branch of knowledge’, his wide-ranging library was renowned. His greatest contribution to learning was his share in the foundation of the University of Tasmania in 1889; he was its vice-chancellor from 17 June 1901 to 23 July 1903.

Inspired as a young man by Higinbotham and by the Italian patriot and author Giuseppe Mazzini, of whom he had a picture in every room, Clark remained a republican. In 1891 he wrote that ‘the leopard could as soon change his spots as I become a supporter of plutocracy and class privilege’. Ten years later he wrote an essay on ‘The Evils of Monarchy’ in answer to James Bryce, Studies in History and Jurisprudence (London, 1901). Clark visited America in 1897 armed with letters of introduction from Miss Margaret Windeyer to leading feminists. His youngest son claimed that ‘the judge was through his life a great admirer of ladies, whose society he often greatly enjoyed. He always warmly defended their equality in native intellect with the sterner sex, and he can lay claim to the no mean distinction of being the first man to fight an election in Tasmania in favour of adult suffrage’.

Clark enjoyed a rich family life. Moncure Conway long remembered him under his ‘vine and ‘figtree’ with his wife and children. He was never too busy to mend a toy for a child, and his wife once wrote on hearing of his imminent return from America that ‘to celebrate your return I must do something or bust’. Clark died on 14 November 1907 at his home, Rosebank, Battery Point, Hobart, survived by his wife, five sons and two daughters. Of his sons, Alexander became an engineer, Andrew a judge, Conway an architect, Wendell a doctor and Carrel clerk of the Legislative Council. In 1894 Clark had been given the title of ‘Honourable’ for life.

Authorised by the School of History and Classics
© University of Tasmania
Copyright and Disclaimers | Accessibility | Site Feedback

Last Modified: 24-Oct-2003